• Photo Gallery
  • Bulls
  • Females
  • Embryos
  • Semen
  • Breedplan
  • Privacy
Cattle
  • Home
  • Stud Details
  • Competition Success
  • Meat Enquiry
  • Farm History
  • Herd Health
  • Bull Commentary
Farm Operations
  • Hay Contracting
  • On Farm Innovation
  • Environmental Projects
  • Feed Efficiency Project
  • Videos
More information
  • Contact Us
  • Blonde Breedplan EBV Enquiry
  • Web Links
Home Feed Efficiency Project

Feed Efficiency Project

Second Feed Trial Results

In our second feed efficiency trial, we tested 18 Blonde and Blonde x bulls, and 12 Brahman, Charolais and Charolais x Angus bulls for feed efficiency. Cattle were fed in accordance with the PBBA standards manual for a period of 77days. The Blonde bulls were mostly small weaners around 150-250 kg at entry. Weight gains for these bulls were lower than the first trial due to their smaller entry weight. Feed conversion ratio was as good or better. Despite this, a Blonde bull was again top weight gainer for the trial (AR PE0036). The heavier Blonde bulls had better ADG than the lighter bulls at entry. This makes a direct comparison betweebn results hard.

RFI has been calculated on 100% inclusion, eg, all animals considered together. The results are presented in the table below:

  

Breed Tag FCR ADG start wgt gain RFI Sire Dam
Blonde AR PF0011 3.343896 2 178 154 -0.97251  Orion R Violet
Blonde AR 3F0036 3.529857 1.818182 142 140 -0.18328  Bellevue's Kenworth R Rachael (Pp)
Blonde AR PF0013 3.581119 1.857143 165 143 -0.39218  Garonne Aramac (Pp) R Adidas
Blonde HM PF0015 3.637 1.818182 156 140 -0.18508  Banya Nomad HM Wandana
Blonde AR PF0026 3.68087 1.792208 196 138 -0.66697  Rahnik Beefmaster R Violet
Blonde AR PF0014 3.696333 1.558442 154 120 -0.20525  Drop R Wildflower
Blonde x AR 2F0028 3.711818 2 170 154 -0.12809  Bradbury Evan R Steffi
Blonde AR 3F0038 3.842239 1.74026 150 134 0.213825  Willroy Calypso R Xylose
Blonde AR PF0030 3.95 1.792208 176 138 0.085752  Amaroo Upmarket R Button (Pp)
Blonde AR 3F0021 4.050933 1.948052 216 150 -0.11467  Bellevue's Kenworth R Bo-Peep (Pp)
Charolais 2740 4.078061 2.545455 354 196 -1.1381
Angus 2736 4.08883 2.441558 354 188 -1.2231
Blonde AR PF0020 4.329405 2.181818 268 168 0.063962  Banya Nomad Garonne Yolanda
Blonde AR PE0036 4.390857 2.727273 346 210 0.003555  Rathdowney Arena R Rainbow
Brahman 2738 4.585283 1.376623 262 106 -0.54448
Blonde AR PF0012 4.597619 1.636364 214 126 0.497979  Onyx R Whisper
Brahman 2741 4.744468 1.220779 306 94 -1.14676
Blonde AR PF0009 4.767077 1.688312 200 130 1.049944  Amaroo Upmarket R Special
Blonde AR 3E0032 4.805057 2.25974 424 174 -0.61088  Rathdowney Beta R Xannie
Blonde x Red Poll AR 1F0019 4.836 1.558442 224 120 0.617941  Helion Red Poll base dam
Blonde x Brahman AR 2F0018 4.850147 1.766234 242 136 0.77847  Garonne Aramac (Pp) R tag 118
Char x Ang 2743 4.936337 2.623377 416 202 0.483532
Char x Ang 2745 4.94596 2.571429 474 198 -0.2416
Brahman 2737 4.962615 1.688312 332 130 -0.2952
Brahman 2739 4.994615 1.688312 388 130 -0.90759
Charolais 2744 5.032255 2.649351 426 204 0.675209
Charolais 2502 5.060847 1.532468 240 118 0.707162
Char x Ang 2747 5.304444 2.103896 352 162 0.993493
Blondex Brahman AR 1F0024 5.513562 1.896104 290 146 1.665708  Rathdowney Carbine R tag 122
Charolais 2742 5.578072 2.155844 402 166 1.119215
Averages: 4.447519 1.954545 273.9 150.5

 

 FCR = Feed Conversion Ratio (kgs feed eaten / liveweight gain), ADG = Average daily gain , RFI = Residual Feed Intake.

 

We have now tested over 50 bulls in the last 2 years, and the most efficient ones are now producing calves in our herds. All of these bulls have acceptable Feed conversion ratio, although there is a 40% difference between the best and the worst, which means there is plenty of opportunity to select more efficient cattle, which will not only convert feed more efficiently, but produce less methane over their entire lives. Additionally, you can see that this difference exists not only for the group as a whole, but also between the best and worst tested for each breed.

Last year, Rathdowney Destroyer was the standout performer, combining excellent weight gain with outstanding FCR. His first calves are now being born, and he has since been sold to a commercial herd in Central Queensland. The Blonde bulls in this trial with good combined figures are E36, F11 and F20, and of Warrens bulls, 2740 and 2736. Six of the Blonde bulls have since been castrated, mainly for being crossbred bulls.

If you are interested in testing your cattle in our facility, please use the contact form to make an enquiry. The Running Creek Feed Test Station is an accredited Central Test facility. You can also keep up to date on happennings at the feed test station, by 'liking' Rathdowney Blondes page on facebook.

 

 

Rathdowney Blondes have established a small feed test station in a feedlot approximately 5km from our stud. In conjunction with Warren Drynan of Glenapp, we applied for and were successful with an establishment grant from Landcare Australia and Woolworths. The first stage of the project involved identifying and purchasing the necessary equipment, and then laying a concrete slab and building a shed to house it in to protect it from the weather. To see the photo gallery, click here. Click on our videos page to see youtube videos of the test station.

The aim of the station is to test beef cattle for Net Feed Efficiency (NFE), also known as Residual Feed Intake (RFI). It is commonly called feed conversion ratio, which is the amount of feed consumed per kg of liveweight gain. Cattle are confined to small pens and fed a controlled ration over an approximate 100 day period. They are weighed weekly and consumption is calculated daily. At the conclusion of the trial it is simple to work out the Feed conversion ratio (FCR) by dividing the amount of feed consumed by total liveweight gain under trial. Net Feed Efficiency also takes into account of the animals liveweight gain in relation to its body weight.

  

The Feed station was registered with the Performance Beef Breeders Assocaition (PBBA) who have some minimum standards which must be adhered to when testing cattle, especially if the resulting data is to be used for breedplan analysis.

Three pens have been built which will enable us to record approximately 30-35 head at once. Data is logged to disk each day and a separate program saves each days data file separately. We purchased a new desktop computer to run the system, and installed a number of serial/rs232 ports on it to connect to the scales and RFID reader. We could not find a competitively priced UPS (uninterruptable power supply), so we built our own using advice found online. You can find an article dedicated to the homemade UPS here, or keep reading below for more details. (or click on our video page for a link to a youtube video of ours)

Due to the unique nature of the project we have had to modify available products as we did not have the funds to purchase ready made gear. The feed bins were purchased from Polyworldand then modified by putting a single folded piece of sheet metal into the bins and reinforcing the sides with some 60mmx2mm flat.  We needed to use a poly bin so that the RFID reader worked better without interference from too much metal. We chose the bin from Polyworld due to its price and it was the closest product we could find that matched our needs, even thought they built it with a different use in mind (PolyTrolley PT12, normally comes with wheels and shelves for materials handling). The feed bins also have some folded metal in the bottom to pushed the feed from the sides, as it was unlikely the cattle would ever eat all of the feed from the bin. This is just to keep the feed fresher.  

Harrington Systems Electronicswas chosen as the RFID supplier. This was due to their ability to provide an excellent product at an acceptable cost, with great during and after sales support that you sometimes wouldn't get with a larger company. There is an RFID reader installed in each feed bin to read animals as they consume feed. The reader is protected from reading animals that are standing close to the bin but not eating.

Australasia Scales is the supplier and installer of the load beams and indicators. We have used a load beam/ indicator combination with an accuracy of 20 grams to get excellent data for future analysis. The indicators are connected to the computer which records the change in weights of the feed bin.

Beaudesert Gates and Steel (07 55411777) did the sheet metal work for the feed bins and the welding of the bin platform. I drilled the holes for the load beams in the required location before letting them weld it up.

The computer we are using is a DellVostro 220, which seems to be an excellent computer. We installed a PCI express/4 port serial card internally, and then used a usb/serial cable, and pre-installed com port for the remaining serial connections. The computer has a 160GB hard drive, 3MB RAM, and a 2.70Ghz dual core processor. We felt we needed processing power rather than storage capacity as there is a lot going on all at once.

The computer is housed in an old fridge to protect it further from the weather. There is a DIY cable gland made from inner tube to let the cables into it, and a 240V, 80mm extraction fan (from Jaycar) to take out the hot air. The computer is protected from dust by a large 20x25cm filter on the outside of the fridge, as well as internal filtration (such as when door of fridge is open). The doors of the fridge can be locked and the fridge is secured to prevent it tipping over. One shelf has been modified to be a retractable keyboard tray. The monitor and fan are connected to 240V mains power, so that in the event of a power outage, they do not draw from the UPS battery pack.

The UPS is 2 x 12V car batteries connected in parallel (positive/positive). The batteries are Century N70ZZ, which are RC140, 80Ah, 660CCA batteries. The batteries are charged by a Projecta 35A battery charger, and the system is powered by a 600W Projecta Modified sine wave inverter. I estimate that the system should be able to run, in the event of power failure,  3 x indicators, 3 x RFID readers and the desktop computer for at least 6-8 hours. In mid April, I turned off the battery charger to test system longevity. I had one NLIS reader on to log the time every second . The monitor was turned off, but the air extraction fan was on. The charger was turned off at 11:52 am, and the last data logged was at 03:46 am the next morning, almost 16 hours later. In the normal operating environment, there would be 3 x scales and another 2 readers connected to this system, but they draw a miniscule amount of power.

Auto electrical work on the cable ends to make permanent connections was by Rathdowney Motors 07 55441164. They are able to supply the inverter and battery charger at a competive price.

In April 2010, a mob of 10 friesian heifers was put in the pens for approximately 2 weeks to generate trial data for further processing. It also allowed us to fine tune the data recording methods, and ensure accurate data logging. We have since installed a small shield for the NLIS readers, and panelling to slow down the entry and exit of animals from the feeding area. In early June 2010, cattle were introduced again to test the modifications.

The first intake of cattle was done on 30th June 2010. The trial started with a weigh-in for the cattle on 21st July, after a 21 day introductory period. A field day will be held on 16th September,  2010, at 9:30 am, when the animals have been on feed and we have some interesting data to present.  To register your interest, please send us an email or give us a call, you can find our details on the contact us page. The first trial is expected to finish in early October 2010.

 

First Feed Trial Results

Our first feed trial is complete and the results are in. Efficiencies ranged from 3.62:1 to 8.5:1 and all animals gained in excess of 2kg/day, with the best at 3.09kg/day. The animals were fed for 77 days during the test. The following table has all of the data summarised, plus the carcase scans I had done on my own cattle.stabndout performance is D35, who is second for FCR and first for weight gain overall. I am using him over my heifers this season. HME2 was first for efficiency, and there is more than 10% difference between first and second which is a remarkable achievement. An important note is that there is as much difference in herds as there is between breeds. In both instances, the worst for feed efficiency is about 50% worse than the best animal from the same herd. The least efficient Blonde was also the fattest, which is not surprising.

These results confirm that Blondes are one of the most efficient beef catle breeds for feed efficiency. With feed effiency having a heritability of about 0.42, it is one of the most highly heritable traits that you can easily breed into your herd, by using bulls of known performance.

 

Tag Breed Efficiency Gain/day Weight EMA sq cm P8 mm Rib mm IMF %
HME2 Blonde 3.62 2.16 368 100 1 1 2.3
D35 Blonde 4.08 3.09 600 123 3 2 3.0
E11 Blonde 4.09 2.31 438 107 2 2 2.3
D34 Blonde 4.11 2.96 602 116 2 2 2.6
D33 Blonde 4.26 2.42 552 119 1 1 2.2
E9 Blonde 4.31 2.23 410 103 2 2 2.6
E28 Blonde 4.47 2.29 446 104 3 2 2.8
E25 7/8 Blonde 4.65 2.26 410 84 2 2 2.9
2967 Brahman 4.8 2.37 544
1562 Santa 4.97 2.49 536
1630 Braford 5.21 2.97 634
1755 Charolais 5.31 3.07 626
D37 Blonde 5.35 2.29 522 98 4 4 3.5
3016 Braford 5.37 2.66 654
2885 Charbray 5.52 2.69 626
3030 Charbray 5.68 2.56 656
1758 Charolais 5.71 2.97 650
1997 Black Bally 6.26 2.06 552
1729 Charbray 6.54 2.67 631
1768 Charolais 6.99 2.74 738
1752 Charbray 8.5 2.34 698
 
feed-image

Copyright © 2009 Rathdowney Blondes. All Rights Reserved.

Designed by Sarah Arkinstall.